dulbeccos modified eagles medium (dmem) complete culture media Search Results


90
Fisher Scientific media dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem) sh30284.02
Media Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Dmem) Sh30284.02, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/media dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem) sh30284.02/product/Fisher Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
media dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem) sh30284.02 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MatTek dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem, supplied by MatTek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem/product/MatTek
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences cell complete medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Cell Complete Medium Containing 4.5 G/L Glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Dmem), supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell complete medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem)/product/Corning Life Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell complete medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (dmem) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Axenia Inc complete dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem), supplied by Axenia Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/complete dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem)/product/Axenia Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
complete dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biochrom cell culture media dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem), -glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Cell Culture Media Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem), Glutamine, Penicillin And Streptomycin, supplied by Biochrom, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell culture media dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem), -glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin/product/Biochrom
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell culture media dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem), -glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Beijing Solarbio Science high sugar dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (dmem) 12100-500
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
High Sugar Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Dmem) 12100 500, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/high sugar dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (dmem) 12100-500/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
high sugar dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (dmem) 12100-500 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) /hams f-12 50/50 mix media (cat # 16-405-cv)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Dmem (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) /Hams F 12 50/50 Mix Media (Cat # 16 405 Cv), supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) /hams f-12 50/50 mix media (cat # 16-405-cv)/product/Corning Life Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) /hams f-12 50/50 mix media (cat # 16-405-cv) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza glia complete medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Glia Complete Medium Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem), supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glia complete medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem)/product/Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glia complete medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MatTek cell culture medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) provided by
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Cell Culture Medium Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem) Provided By, supplied by MatTek, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell culture medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) provided by/product/MatTek
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell culture medium dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) provided by - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) and ham’s f12 medium (1:1)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Dmem (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) And Ham’s F12 Medium (1:1), supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) and ham’s f12 medium (1:1)/product/Corning Life Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium) and ham’s f12 medium (1:1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences culture plates with dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle medium)
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Culture Plates With Dmem (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium), supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/culture plates with dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle medium)/product/Corning Life Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
culture plates with dmem (dulbecco’s modified eagle medium) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
PRIMACYT Cell Culture Technology GmbH dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) media
Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS <t>(Dulbecco’s</t> phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Dmem) Media, supplied by PRIMACYT Cell Culture Technology GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) media/product/PRIMACYT Cell Culture Technology GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (dmem) media - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.

Journal: Cutaneous and ocular toxicology

Article Title: Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model

doi: 10.1080/15569527.2016.1211671

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean +/− SD, N=4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. For Ag 10 nm PVP, two lots were used (L1 and L2). Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Nanoparticles received in dry powder form (titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide) were weighed on an analytical balance, suspended in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided by MatTek) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and subsequently dispersed using a probe sonicator (Misonix Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disrupter XL, Farmingdale, NY) with 4.5 watts output for 3 pulses, 2 seconds/pulse 25 .

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control

Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to titanium and cerium dioxide nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. DMEM (Dubelco’s minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum) was the vehicle for the TiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001.

Journal: Cutaneous and ocular toxicology

Article Title: Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model

doi: 10.1080/15569527.2016.1211671

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to titanium and cerium dioxide nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. DMEM (Dubelco’s minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum) was the vehicle for the TiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Nanoparticles received in dry powder form (titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide) were weighed on an analytical balance, suspended in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided by MatTek) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and subsequently dispersed using a probe sonicator (Misonix Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disrupter XL, Farmingdale, NY) with 4.5 watts output for 3 pulses, 2 seconds/pulse 25 .

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control

Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001. *, % viability for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle significantly less than that for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle in Fig 2, p < 0.05.

Journal: Cutaneous and ocular toxicology

Article Title: Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model

doi: 10.1080/15569527.2016.1211671

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001. *, % viability for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle significantly less than that for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle in Fig 2, p < 0.05.

Article Snippet: Nanoparticles received in dry powder form (titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide) were weighed on an analytical balance, suspended in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided by MatTek) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and subsequently dispersed using a probe sonicator (Misonix Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disrupter XL, Farmingdale, NY) with 4.5 watts output for 3 pulses, 2 seconds/pulse 25 .

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control

Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3–4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001. *, % viability for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle significantly greater than that for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle in Fig 3, p < 0.05.

Journal: Cutaneous and ocular toxicology

Article Title: Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model

doi: 10.1080/15569527.2016.1211671

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to silver nanoparticles of various sizes and coatings for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3–4. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidine) is a coating. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly different from negative control, p < 0.001. *, % viability for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle significantly greater than that for Ag 50 nm PVP nanoparticle in Fig 3, p < 0.05.

Article Snippet: Nanoparticles received in dry powder form (titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide) were weighed on an analytical balance, suspended in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided by MatTek) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and subsequently dispersed using a probe sonicator (Misonix Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disrupter XL, Farmingdale, NY) with 4.5 watts output for 3 pulses, 2 seconds/pulse 25 .

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control

Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles of various sizes for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. DMEM (Dubelco’s minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum) was the vehicle for the TiO2 nanoparticles. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001.

Journal: Cutaneous and ocular toxicology

Article Title: Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model

doi: 10.1080/15569527.2016.1211671

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human equivalent skin model tissue viability (%) exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles of various sizes for 1 h. Data represents mean ± SD, N=3. The concentration of each nanoparticle sample was 1 mg/mL. DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was the negative control. 5% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) was the positive control. DMEM (Dubelco’s minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum) was the vehicle for the TiO2 nanoparticles. Chemicals with a mean value below the dashed line at 50% viability were considered to be dermal irritants. ***, significantly from negative control, p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Nanoparticles received in dry powder form (titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide) were weighed on an analytical balance, suspended in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) provided by MatTek) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and subsequently dispersed using a probe sonicator (Misonix Microson Ultrasonic Cell Disrupter XL, Farmingdale, NY) with 4.5 watts output for 3 pulses, 2 seconds/pulse 25 .

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control